How does theology enlist the service of historical materialism? What is this service?

I have a quote from Zizek I’m having a little trouble with. Its this one: Today, when the historical materialist analysis is receding, practiced
as it were under cover, rarely called by its proper name, while the
theological dimension is given a new lease on life in the guise of the
“postsecular” Messianic turn of deconstruction, the time has come
to reverse Walter Benjamin’s first thesis on the philosophy of history:
“The puppet called ‘theology’ is to win all the time. It can easily be
a match for anyone if it enlists the service of historical materialism,
which today, as we know, is wizened and has to keep out of sight.” The trouble I’m having is with “if it enlists the service of historical materialism,” That is to say I dont understand in what way this service is enlisted, or for that matter, what it is. Can anyone help me?

In response to The Plague of Fantasies by Slavoj Žižek

3 responses Post a response

3 responses

This is off topic, but nonetheless; I have heard rumors that Zizek is working on a 'Hegel book', to be published sometime this summer. Is there any truth to this? 

Srdjan
0 people think so
What you need is Walter Benjamin's 'Theses on the concept of history'. All will be revealed concerning Zizek's image - which is Benjamin's just flipped. A fuller account of historical materialism can be found in Benjamin's 'Fuchs, collector and historian'
0 people think so
Benjamins original purpose was to use theology in the service of historical materialism - His main theoretical (and practical) mission in the Theses of history is to make a productive contradiction: i.e. the dialectic in Benjamin's thought consists of this effort to combine a messianic approach to theology (what will come) with a materialist view of history, and thereby use the 'failed' futures of past and forgotten struggles against oppression to forge a new future in the present. This is a highly original (and has been quite influential, as witnessed in f.ex. Zizek's latest work Living in the end times) way of thinking about history as such, and about materialist philosophy in particular.
And this is also why Benjamin uses perculiar sentences about revolution not being 'a fast moving train' (as Marx would have put it), but rather an 'emergency brake' to stop the chain of events and progress as such. He doesn't aim at a 'fulfillment' of history (as dialectic materialism would have it); the classless society is rather a 'disruption' of history..
The opposition in his view of history is between a circular and a linear understanding, Benjamin is here oriented towards the circular; understood as a return of the past or the coming of the.. (precisely as theology) opposed to 'progress'.
The messianic element in Benjamin's thought is both utopistic and a bold attempt of re-thinking commonly held marxist assumptions about progress and history. Marxism in this view ammounts to a kind of secularised theology - remember here what Zizek has claimed apropos Lacan; that theologicans are the greatest materialists. Yet another paradoxical approach, which is a sign of the productive origins in Benjamin's elaboration of a messianic-revolutionary perspective on history. So indeed; this is one of Zizek's greatest inspirations even today, and references to Benjamin can be found throughout his work, from The Sublime Object of Ideology and onwards.
2 people think so

Add a response

Do you have an account?

Yes / No

Please login below to submit your comment.

Don't have an account? Register

Please register below to submit your comment.

Interests

If any of these are selected, we’ll send occasional emails about events and new books—no more than one email per fortnight, and you can opt out at any time.

Already Registered? Log in