The Invention of the White Race
The Origin of Racial Oppression inAnglo-America
by Theodore W. Allen
Introduction to the Second Edition[by Jeffrey B. Perry]
PART ONE: Labor Problems of the European Colonizing Powers
1. The Labor Supply Problem: England a Special Case
2. English Background, with Anglo-American Variations Noted
3. Euro-Indian Relations and the Problem of Social Control
PART TWO: The Plantation of Bondage
4. The Fateful Edition to “Present Profit”
5. The Massacre of the Tenantry
6. Bricks without Straw: Bondage, but No Intermediate Stratum
PART THREE: Road to Rebellion
7. Bond-Labor: Enduring . . .
8. . . . and Resisting
9. The Insubstantiality of the Intermediate Stratum
10. The Status of African-Americans
PART FOUR: Rebellion and Reaction
11. Rebellion – And Its Aftermath
12. The Abortion of the “White Race” Social Control System in theAnglo-Caribbean
13. The Invention of the White Race – and the Ordeal of America
Appendix II-A: (see Chapter 1, note 64 [re “Maroon communities” in theAmericas])
Appendix II-B: (see Chapter 2, note 6 [re Wat Tyler’s Rebellion])
Appendix II-C: (see Chapter 5, note 46 [re the “’cheap commodity’ strategy forcapitalist conquest and William Bullock])
Appendix II-D: (see Chapter 7, note 197 [re the bond-labor system])
Appendix II-E: (see Chapter 9, note 54 [re reduction in the supply of personsin England “available for bond-labor in the plantation colonies”])
Appendix F: (see Chapter 13, note 26 [re William Gooch and the discussion ofwhite supremacy among the ruling classes in eighteenth-century Virginia])
Editor’s Appendix G: A Guide to TheInvention of the White Race Volume II
Editor’s Appendix H: Select Bibliography on Theodore W. Allen
Index [Newly Expanded]
It is great to see a critical piece on Thomas Friedman given the undue veneration he is accorded in U.S. society. Now, what is still needed is a critique of his domestic issues counter part at the NYT, David Brooks. Won't someone, please, write a book exp
Perry Anderson has produced a brilliant study of the EU, the organisation which poses the greatest threat to us in today. He displays, as usual, his peerless acuity and huge range of reference.
This book includes superb surveys of , , , and , but not of . explains grandly, “I do not regret the omission of , whose history since the fall of Thatcher has been of little moment.” (It was not a ‘fall’ - we pushed her out.) He refers to ‘’ three pages later, then to again, then to the , a slippage whose uncharacteristic uncertainty betrays his disdain for its object.
He shows that the EU had no democratic foundations. Jean Monnet, the ‘father of ’, was an international financier, never elected to anything. Now the EU ‘more and more openly flouts the popular will’.
rightly cites the falls in EU election turnout as evidence that the EU ‘wants even a modicum of popular credibility’. Yet he inconsistently writes of US elections that high abstention rates are ‘the surest sign of popular contentment with society as it is’.
observes sensibly of Le Pen’s Front National, “Immigration is a minority phenomenon, virtually by definition, as war between the classes was not. In consequence, xenophobic responses to it, however ugly, have little power of political multiplication. Aron, who had witnessed the rise of Nazism in and knew what he was talking about, understood this from the start, criticizing panicky over-estimations of the Front. In effect, from the mid-eighties onwards its electoral scores oscillated within a fixed range, never dropping much below a national average of 10 per cent and never rising above 15 per cent.” There is no need to obsess about the far tinier BNP.
On the EU’s economic policies, he quotes EU-enthusiast Andrew Moravcsik: “the EU is overwhelmingly about the promotion of free markets. Its primary interest group support comes from multinational firms, not least US ones.” And, “The EU is basically about business.” Its Constitution makes a ‘highly competitive’ market ‘free of distortions’ a legal obligation, wrecking a ‘social ’.
Inside monetary union, “The historic commitments … to full employment and social services … cease to have any further institutional purchase.” Growth suffers too. Before the euro started in 1999, growth was 2.4 per cent a year, after, 2.1 per cent. Non-euro EU members grew faster than euro members. Eurozone income per head rose more slowly than in the previous decade, while productivity growth halved.
points out that British governments always sought a wider EU, wanting to use the ‘vast reserve armies of cheap labour in the East, exerting downward pressure on wage costs in the West’. He shows the EU’s embrace of capitalism, its contempt for democracy and its failure to create either a European society or a common culture.
He ends the book with the feeblest of forecasts – “But it remains unlikely that time and contradiction have come to a halt.” He is brilliant at tracing intellectuals’ responses to problems, but not at engaging with the problems or proposing solutions.
Which translation is this?