more images
image
Slavoj Žižek
Slavoj Žižek is a Slovenian philosopher and cultural critic. He is a professor at the European Graduate School, International Director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities, Birkbeck College, University of London, and a senior researcher at the Institute of Sociology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. His books include Living in the End Times, First as Tragedy, Then as Farce, In Defense of Lost Causes, four volumes of the Essential Žižek, and many more.
Blog
Full Communism
There are Reds under the bed. Or in the academies. Or worse: about to spill into the streets. So warns Alan Johnson in World Affairs, the esteemed Washington-based international affairs journal. Tracing the rising profile of a group of authors such as Alain Badiou, Bruno Bosteels and Slavoj Žižek and the popularity of their books, the columnist outlines what he sees as a nascent threat lurking in the incendiary words of Terry Eagleton and Toni Negri.
"This was madness": Slavoj Žižek vs David Horowitz with Julian Assange
It was bound to end in disaster: two ideologues, one a communist and the other a neo-conservative, "do battle" over a skype link from a house in England where Assange is held under house arrest.
"I'm James Bond, you're Superman" - BHL head to head with Žižek
Berfois have published an excerpt from the latest in the Counterblasts series, The Imposter: BHL in Wonderland by Jade Lindgaard and Xavier de la Porte, a stinging takedown of Bernard-Henri Lévy, France's "rock-star philosopher."
Watch BHL debate Slavoj Žižek in 2008. They go head to head on the subject of 'Violence and the Left in Dark Times' at the New York Public Library.
Books
-
Less Than Nothing
Slavoj Žižek's masterwork on the Hegelian legacy
-
Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?
Undermining the liberal-democratic consensus that enables the designation of totalitarianism. -
Revolution at the Gates
How to reinvent Lenin in the era of “cultural capitalism.”
-
Living in the End Times
Žižek analyzes the end of the world at the hands of the “four riders of the apocalypse.”
-
Contingency, Hegemony, Universality
The Hegelian legacy, Left strategy, and post-structuralism versus Lacanian psychoanalysis.
-
The Idea of Communism
An all-star cast of radical intellectuals discuss the continued importance of communism.
-
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock)
Hitchcock gets onto the analyst’s couch in this extraordinary volume of case studies.
-
In Defense of Lost Causes
Acclaimed, adrenalin-fuelled manifesto for universal values.
-
First As Tragedy, Then As Farce
From the tragedy of 9/11 to the farce of the financial meltdown.
-
The Fragile Absolute
Argues that the subversive core of the Christian legacy forms the foundation of a politics of universal emancipation.
-
The Plague of Fantasies
The relations between fantasy and ideology, and the deluge of digital phantasms surrounding us.
-
The Sublime Object of Ideology
Exploring the ideologies fantasies of wholeness and exclusion which make up human society.
-
The Ticklish Subject
A specter is haunting Western thought, the specter of the Cartesian subject.
-
For They Know Not What They Do
The eminent philosopher explodes the roles of pleasure and desire in contemporary politics and culture.
-
The Indivisible Remainder
Confronts Schelling with Hegel, and illuminates popular culture and modern subjectivity.
-
Virtue and Terror
Robespierre’s justification of the Terror in the French Revolution.
-
Lacan
A dazzling re-evaluation of Jacques Lacan, uncovering his hidden inspirations.
-
The Metastases of Enjoyment
The status of women and the role of violence in contemporary culture and politics.
-
Iraq
Žižek analyzes the bizarre logic used to justify the attack on Iraq.
-
Welcome to the Desert of the Real
Probing beneath the level of TV punditry, Žižek offers a highly original and readable account that serves as a fascinating and insightful comprehension of the events of September 11.
-
Mapping Ideology
Indispensable contemporary writing on the subject of ideology.
Discussions
Discussions occur on book pages throughout the site. The most recent discussions about the works of Slavoj Žižek are listed below.
-
Zizek and the critique of political economy
Against his friend and comrade Alain Badiou, Slavoj Zizek has been arguing strongly for the need for a return to Marx's critique of political economy—as borne out by his engagement with value theory and Moishe Postone's work in Living in the End Times. But what are we to make of Zizek's own understanding of value theory, when he claims that, strictly speaking from a Marxist perpective, Chavez's Venezuela is "exploiting" the US through oil rents? -
How does theology enlist the service of historical materialism? What is this service?
I have a quote from Zizek I’m having a little trouble with. Its this one:
Today, when the historical materialist analysis is receding, practiced
as it were under cover, rarely called by its proper name, while the
theological dimension is given a new lease on life in the guise of the
“postsecular” Messianic turn of deconstruction, the time has come
to reverse Walter Benjamin’s first thesis on the philosophy of history:
“The puppet called ‘theology’ is to win all the time. It can easily be
a match for anyone if it enlists the service of historical materialism,
which today, as we know, is wizened and has to keep out of sight.”The trouble I’m having is with “if it enlists the service of historical materialism,” That is to say I dont understand in what way this service is enlisted, or for that matter, what it is. Can anyone help me?
-
Fetishization and Reification, Human Constants or the Particular Products of Capitalism?
Grappling with Marx's theoretical dilemma on whether class struggle is the product of capitalism, coterminus with it or its condition, Zizek suggests that this same dilemma illuminates the difference between Lukác's History and Class Consciousness and Adorno & Horkheimer's Dialectic of Enlightenment, wherein he latter authors "cut [the] link" (that Lukác maintains) between fetichization and reification on one hand and captitalism on the other, considering them products of "instrumental reason" (e.g. using people as a means to an ends), "...which functions as a kind of a priori of thewhole of human history but no longer rooted in any concrete historical formations. The over-arching totality is thus no longer that of capitalism, or commodity production : capitalism itself becomes one of the manifestations of instrumental reason." (p. 204)
This problem is resolved if we merely extend our notion of "human history" to go back to Pleistocene (hunter-gatherer) times and follow it through the agricultural revolution and the dawn of civilization, viz. citification, the creation of cities. Hunter-gatherer cultures are dominated by scarcity of the means of survival. There is a social hierarchy, but it is not based on possessions, because most daytime activity is devoted to the search for food. Once agriculture is discovered, however, a few milenia after the last glacial maximum around 12,000 years ago, there is surplus production, permitting substantial population grown and eventually leading to the establishment of cities, around six or seven thousand years ago. With surplus production comes the accumulation of wealth, the creation of classes (workers, owners, priests, etc.), the establishment of chiefdoms and then city-states, and finally conquest, as some city-states covet the resources of their neighbors, devote a certain amount of their surplus to military materiel, and gobble up their neighbors.
It is an abstract nicety to call the motivations for these appropriations "instrumental reason." They could also be called greed, covetousness, or imperial arrogance. In any case, they only arise when there is surplus, and the first sustained surpluses in human history (starting at least 40,000 years ago and not 5,000 years ago) come with the invention of agriculture.
Capitalism from this perspective is merely a concentration, institutionalization, mechanization, and acceleration of organizations based on technological advances and greatly expanded populations, to produce exponentially more surplus value and its resultant accumulation, and finally engendering the inequality and suffering that we are so familiar with, and which motivated Marx to deconstruct it.
So Adorno & Horkheimer had the right intuition; they simply lacked the expanded perspective in pre-history to concretize it.