Gareth Peirce on The Birmingham Six twenty years on: "Have we learned from our disgraceful past?"

On the twentieth anniversary since the release of the Birmingham Six, Gareth Peirce, writing for the Guardian, details their wrongful convictions and the "simplest of stupidities" that secured their release.

On 14 March 1991 the Birmingham Six finally walked free. Today, 20 years on, it is vital to appreciate the horrifying detail of what happened to them, and how the truth was not acknowledged for 16 years. The annihilation of justice for others remains an ever-present spectre.

Assessing the  widespread condemnation of the use of torture in extracting confessions following the case of the Birmingham Six, Peirce turns her gaze to the new Muslim suspect community, and asks "if we have, in fact, learned anything at all from our disgraceful past":

At the trial in London last year of a young Muslim, one defence closing speech clearly interested the jury. In the case it was considering, it was being asked to infer involvement in terrorism from coincidences of association and the defendant's clear interest in radical Islam. The speech recalled another trial, that of the Birmingham Six, based equally on seemingly damning coincidences of faith, association and political loyalties. In that case six men, all Irish, all Catholic, had been drinking in a pub at New Street station in Birmingham before boarding a train to catch a ferry to Belfast. Within six minutes, bombs exploded in two pubs on the station precincts. The men, all carrying mass cards, were travelling to the funeral of a friend, an IRA man who had blown himself up whilst assembling a bomb. All were Republican sympathisers. All were convicted in 1975 of the murders of the 21 victims killed in the explosions in the pubs shortly after their train had left for the Heysham ferry. All were completely innocent. Applying lessons of past injustice to the present, the jury acquitted the young Muslim man ...

We have created, without doubt, a new suspect community. The young Muslim man on trial last year faced a different construct. Had he been convicted wrongly, too, there would have been no fabricated notes to discover years later. Instead association and interest might, had the prosecution in his case succeeded, have been enough under yet more emergency legislation to establish support for terrorism. And if acquitted? Control orders exist so that secret courts can (and do) hear secret evidence to severely constrain the liberty even of a person exonerated by a jury.

At least, we console ourselves, we no longer torture terrorist suspects. But is that claim a delusion? If we connive, it makes no difference whether the torture has been outsourced or perpetrated close to home in Birmingham. By the bitter end the case of the six men achieved what the successful elimination of torture requires, a very public accounting. But the detail of the British role in the production of tortured "confessions" in Guantánamo, Pakistan and Morocco is likely never to be publicly exposed; claimed "national security" is intended to ensure permanent secrecy. Twenty years on, we must therefore ask ourselves if we have, in fact, learned anything at all from our disgraceful past.

Visit the Guardian to read the article in full.

Gareth Peirce is part of the "list of 100 of the world's most inspirational women" compiled by the Guardian for International Women's Day.

Legal affairs correspondent Afua Hirsch writes

In the 1980s she represented the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six, victims of the witch-hunt against Irish men during the height of the Troubles. More recently she has become a key architect in the fight against draconian counter-terrorism measures, representing the family of Jean Charles de Menezes, who was shot dead at Stockwell tube station in a bungled terrorism raid, and Moazzam Begg, who was detained in Guantánamo Bay. Her work defending those who are at the sharp end of state power has led many human rights activists to describe her name as "synonymous with civil rights"

Visit the Guardian to read the article in full and for the full list of the "top 100 women."

More in #Articles

1 comment

This is a fine collection of essays by lawyer Gareth Peirce. Together, they make the case that the British government has been complicit in the US state’s recent crimes against humanity: rendition, indefinite detention without trial, and torture.   In the first essay, ‘Make sure you say that you were treated properly’, written in May 2009, Peirce notes that the High Court commented that the British government’s role in Binyam Mohamed’s rendition and torture went ‘far beyond that of a bystander’. She notes the complicity of the British government at every stage of his ordeal.   The UN’s special rapporteur said that states “are responsible where they knowingly engage in, render aid to or assist in the commission of internationally wrongful acts, including violations of human rights.” British intelligence personnel conducted or witnessed more than 2,000 interviews in prisons in Afghanistan, Guantanamo and Iraq where detainees’ rights were flagrantly violated. As the UN rapporteur observed, “the continuous engagement of foreign officials in some instances constituted a form of encouragement or even support.” In the second essay, The framing of al-Megrahi, written in September 2009, Peirce questions the justice of the trial in 2000 of the Libyan citizen Abdelbaset al-Megrahi for the Lockerbie bombing of 1988. Dr Hans Koechler, the UN’s observer, said the trial was ‘not fair’, writing, “the guilty verdict in the case of the first accused [al-Megrahi] is particularly incomprehensible in view of the admission by the judges themselves that the identification of the first accused by the Maltese shop owner was ‘not absolute’ … and that there was a ‘mass of conflicting evidence’.” Koechler wrote, “the presence of at least two representatives of a foreign government in the courtroom during the entire period of the trial was highly problematic. The two state prosecutors from the US Department of Justice were seated next to the prosecution team. They were not listed in any of the official information documents about the Court’s officers produced by the Scottish Court Service, yet they were seen talking to the prosecutors while the Court was in session, checking notes and passing on documents.” As he noted, “the presence of foreign governments in a Scottish courtroom (in any courtroom for that matter) jeopardises the independence and integrity of legal procedures and is not in conformity with the general standards of fairness.” The key scientific witness in the trial had earlier been banned from being called as an expert witness. Koechler wrote, “A general pattern of the trial consisted in the fact that virtually all people presented by the prosecution as key witnesses were proven to lack credibility to a very high extent, in certain cases even having openly lied to the Court.” Koechler concluded, “there is not one single piece of material evidence linking the two accused to the crime. In such a context, the guilty verdict in regard to the first accused appears to be arbitrary, even irrational.” He also described the dismissal of al-Megrahi’s appeal in March 2002 as a ‘spectacular miscarriage of justice’. We still need a full public inquiry into the bombing. In the third essay, Was it like this for the Irish?, written in April 2008, Peirce points out that for 30 years the British state interned innocent Irish people, used torture (hooding, extreme stress positions), brutally obtained false confessions and fabricated evidence. These methods were counter-productive, as well as immoral and illegal.   In the fourth essay, Are we our brothers’ keepers?, written in May 2010, Peirce proposes that we should never let any of our citizens be sent to the USA. She believes that we cannot trust US assurances, given that the US state systematically uses torture in interrogation, that it uses military courts to try civilians, that it inflicts indefinite imprisonment without trial and that it imposes arbitrary and extreme sentences. It regularly threatens 100-year sentences, so it is not surprising that guilty pleas end 97 per cent of US trials. The USA has an estimated 40,000 prisoners in solitary confinement, which is torture.   In a postscript, written in August 2010, Peirce points out that the British Cabinet was responsible for the killings of 14 unarmed civilians in Derry on 30 January 1972, ‘Bloody Sunday’, because it ordered the Paras to police the civil rights march, knowing that the Paras had, six months earlier, killed 11 innocent civilians in Ballymurphy.  
0 people think so

Add a comment

Do you have an account?

Yes / No

Please login below to submit your comment.

Don't have an account? Register

Please register below to submit your comment.

Interests

If any of these are selected, we’ll send occasional emails about events and new books—no more than one email per fortnight, and you can opt out at any time.

Already Registered? Log in